FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS

FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS - Hallo friendsMY LIVE MY WAY, In the article you read this time with the title FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article my style, Article my way, Article New ways, Article their way, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS
link : FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS

Read too


FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS

Before getting to the subject of this post, look at these incredible wells CLR will be reporting, (for more on these wells, see this post):
  • 33121, conf, CLR, Mountain Gap 8-10H1, API 33-025-03237, producing but still confidential; we don't know the number of days of production in 5/18 (I assume a full month); and we don't know how much natural gas produced:
Date Oil Runs MCF Sold
5-2018 70099 0
4-2018 8686 0
3-2018 406 0
2-2018 106 0

  • 33120, conf, CLR, Mountain Gap 7-10H, API 33-025-03236, huge production; 80K+ in first month of unconstrained production; 50,940 mcf = 8,500 boe. Plus the 84,474 = 92,962 boe in first month of unconstrained production:
Date Oil Runs MCF Sold
5-2018 84474 50940
4-2018 7658 0
3-2018 317 0
2-2018 123 0
 
Now the reason for this post.
 
One has to assume, Harold Hamm fracked the heck out of these two wells to get results like this. So, let's check FracFocus (the NDIC would not have this data yet).
 
FracFocus screenshots for these two wells.
 
Now, before you look at them: I have never, never, ever, ever seen an obvious typographical error  posted by FracFocus.
 
First, he production numbers above are correct; a reader verified that his royalty pay stubs confirms this production. So, 99.99999% sure there is no typo above but the NDIC has been known to make errors. But if the pay stubs reflect this production ...
 
Second, I have never seen FracFocus make an obvious typographic error.

If the FracFocus data is correct, then what are we to make of the production numbers of one of the wells above.

Here are the screenshots of the FracFocus data for these two wells. 

I have to run now -- my car is in a spot that means it has to be moved or I get a huge parking ticket. MORE LATER.





Thus Article FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS

That's an article FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS with the link address https://mylivemyidea.blogspot.com/2018/06/fracfocus-data-for-two-wells-currently.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to "FracFocus Data For Two Wells Currently Under Discusson -- June 29, 2018 -- IN PROGRESS"

Post a Comment