Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1 - Hallo friendsMY LIVE MY WAY, In the article you read this time with the title Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article my style, Article my way, Article New ways, Article their way, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1
link : Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1

Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1

Is the narrative about to change? If this was outside the mainstream, that would be one thing, but this is being reported by NBC News. Now that the Mueller report has been released, perhaps NBC News is trying to divert attention. Look at this:

We've been trying to point this out for years. Finally. 

Link here.

A major Greenland glacier that was one of the fastest shrinking ice and snow masses on Earth is growing again, a new NASA study finds.

The Jakobshavn glacier around 2012 was retreating about 1.8 miles and thinning nearly 130 feet annually. But it started growing again at about the same rate in the past two years, according to a study in Monday’s Nature Geoscience. Study authors and outside scientists think this is temporary.

“That was kind of a surprise. We kind of got used to a runaway system,” said Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland ice and climate scientist Jason Box. “The good news is that it’s a reminder that it’s not necessarily going that fast. But it is going.”

It may or may not be temporary, but when we start talking about glaciers growing at this speed, we are talking "climate," not "weather."

Box, who wasn’t part of the study, said Jakobshavn is “arguably the most important Greenland glacier because it discharges the most ice in the northern hemisphere. For all of Greenland, it is king.”

And then look at this:

The water in Disko Bay, where Jakobshavn hits the ocean, is about 3.6 degrees cooler than a few years ago, study authors said.

****************************************

Exhibit A: if we have less than twelve years to get started if we want to save the earth from global warming, why did not one US senator vote to pass a simple non-binding resolution?

Not even the senator who co-sponsored the bill with Occasional-Cortex voted for the bill.

I don't think I've ever seen such a lopsided vote on anything. It looks like a few Democratic senators must have "crossed the aisle" and voted with the GOP. I don't see what the big deal was: vote "yes" and move on. It was a non-binding resolution, for heaven's sakes, and easily defended in any campaign: simply making a statement that "we" need to take action now to stop global warming. Either you believe in the scam or you don't.

Voting "present" -- at least, I guess, we know they were hard at work in Washington, DC. Not only that, but apparently it was labeled a "test vote." LOL.

By the way, in poll after poll after poll, in which respondents are asked the most pressing issue(s) facing the nation, global warming never, never, never makes the list if the poll is "open-ended." That is, the pollster does not provide a list of issues. In every poll in which Americans are simply asked to list the issue(s) that worry them most, global warming is never, never mentioned. And yes, I'm sure someone will find an example to prove me wrong.

Imagine: if any US Senator introduced any of the following non-binding resolutions, and the outcome was 57 against, and not one for it, during the noted administration. A non-binding resolution supporting:

• access to health care insurance for all Americans: Barack Obama
• the president's wish to be the first US president to visit China: "Tricky Dick"
• sending a man to the moon, and safely back to earth: JFK
• the Manhattan Project: FDR 
• freeing the slaves: Abraham Lincoln

We can't even get a single US senator -- even the one who introduced the non-binding resolution -- to vote in support of the US doing its part to "save the earth." I find that amazing.

Losers following the release of the Mueller report:

• first tier losers: President Obama, Hillary Clinton
• second tier losers: the entire US intelligence community; Comey; McCabe;
• third tier loser: all by himself -- Tom Steyer
• fourth tier losers:  too many to list

The mainstream media: not among the losers. Mainstream media is all about making money and they made a lot of money off the "Russian-collusion" trope. There is no evidence to suggest that the mainstream media will change their habits.

https://ift.tt/2dZyQXu

Thus Article Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1

That's an article Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1 This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Nothing About The Bakken -- Wednesday, March 267 2019, T+84, Part 1 with the link address https://mylivemyidea.blogspot.com/2019/03/nothing-about-bakken-wednesday-march.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: